Saturday, March 16, 2013

Jane's Struggle Revisited

1980. A recurring theme in literature is the classic war between a passion and responsibility. For instance, a personal cause, a love, a desire for revenge, a determination to redress a wrong, or some other emotion or drive may conflict with moral duty. Choose a literary work in which a character confronts the demands of a private passion that conflicts with his or her responsibilities. In a well-written essay show clearly the nature of the conflict, its effects upon the character, and its significance to the work.


Charlotte Bronte's Jane Eyre is a classic and beloved novel about a young orphan, Jane Eyre, who faces down all of the challenges in her life to find happiness in the end.  Time and time again, her determination, honor, and spirit are tested, but each time she prevails.  One of her most striking and memorable struggles was that which tested her moral resolve with love, the love she feels for Mr. Rochester.

Even at the beginning of the novel, Jane's character is seen as strong, both mentally and morally.  From her childhood with her aunt and cousins, the Reeds, Jane is abused.  However, in spite of chaos and fear, she remains, for the most part, mentally strong.  While she is being picked on by John Reed, her cousin, who lies about her activities, she retains her belief in telling the truth, and though her aunt never goes to her defense, she keeps her spirit and fends for herself.  Later, while at school, students like her friend Helen Burns submit to the harsh conditions and ultimately perish, but Jane's morality does not allow her to meekly tolerate the treatment they receive and she fights against the school by maintaining her protests of innocence in the face of accusations of deceit.  She knows and respects the moral importance of telling the truth, though Mrs. Reed did little to instill it in her.  In spite of her upbringing, Jane feels a certain moral and personal obligation to stand up for herself and do what is right, which comes back to cause her future pain.

However, trouble arises when she meets the man who employs her as his ward's governess, Mr. Edward Rochester.  At first, he seems only strange, dark, and brooding, perhaps distracted by some unhappy past events.  As time passes, however, mysteries begin to arise and Jane falls in love with him.  When, following a convoluted process which involves her questioning his feelings towards her many times over, he declares his love and asks her to marry him, she is deliriously happy.  However, trouble makes itself apparent in the form of Bertha Rochester, Mr. Rochester's first wife.  During the wedding itself, Mr. Mason, the sister of Bertha, reveals that Mr. Rochester is already married and Jane is thrown into a personal struggle.  Though her heart wishes to stay with her beloved, her morals and honor insist that she cannot stay.  It would be wrong to continue to live under the same roof as a man she loves but could not have, who has tried to deceive her into marrying him, whatever his reasons are.  In the end, her mind and honor reign supreme and she runs away, retaining her name and her honor in spite of her feelings.  During this pivotal moment, Jane demonstrates the strength of her character and the importance of following what is right rather than what is easy.  Though it hurts her to know that she cannot stay with him, she leaves anyway, because her morals dictate that it is the right thing to do.  Jane's personality, her most defining trait, is illustrated through her taking control of her life and the way she leaves Mr. Rochester.

Through the character and struggles of her character, Jane Eyre, Bronte constructs a powerful message for women, that they can be strong and take control of their lives, an inspiring message for women living in her time period to assert their own capabilities and decide their own lives, as Jane did.

Monday, March 11, 2013

Rosencrantz and Guildenstern are Dead Summary

Tom Stoppard

  • post-modern playwright and movie director (directed the movie adaptation)
  • Theatre of the Absurd
Setting
  • Unclear setting for most of the play
  • Presumably outside, in Elsinore, and on a boat
  • Abrupt scene changes with little or no transitions - Ophelia just comes running in to signal a change
Plot
Act One
  • Guildenstern is flipping coins and keeps getting heads as Rosencrantz bets on it.  Guildenstern is questioning this phenomenon and explains it poorly while Rosencrantz simply accepts it but feels bad for Guildenstern losing so much money. - "A weaker man might be moved to re-examine his faith, if in nothing else at least in the law of probability."  "The law of probability, it has been oddly asserted, is something to do with the proposition that if six monkeys..."
  • Rambling discussions from probability to toenails (courtesy of Rosencrantz) turns to trying to remember what happened.  Guildenstern is concerned by Rosencrantz' lack of memory.  Transition to talking about what brought them there. - "(tensed up by this rambling): Do you remember the first thing that happened today?"
  • Conversation about the past, realize they have no idea where they're going - "We were sent for."  "That's why we're here...  Travelling."  "We are entitled to some direction.  ...I would have thought."
  • Conversation about waiting for something unexpected and making it seem expected - "The more witnesses there are the thinner it gets and the more reasonable it becomes until it is as thin as reality, the name we give to the common experience..."
  • Tragedians come!  Player makes references to prostitution for money but Rosencrantz misses it entirely.  Guildenstern gets it but gets horrified by the implications when Alfred is offered.  *Note: First time Rosencrantz confuses their names.  Rosencrantz finally gets it but Guildenstern offers a bet: heads vs. tails.  Then switch to another impossibility - doubling a number gets an odd number.  Offer of Alfred countered by offer of putting on a play.  End with reveal that the last coin was tails. - "We can give you a tumble if that's your taste, and times being what they are."  "It costs little to watch, and little more if you happen to get caught up in the action..."  "You and I, Alfred - we could create a dramatic precedent here."
  • Ophelia runs by chased by Hamlet, reenact scene Ophelia describes in Hamlet.  Claudius and Gertrude enter; more misidentification.  Lines spoken from Hamlet.  Then Ros and Guil act melancholy and confused with some mixed metaphors.  Ros is frustrated with not remembering anything.  Guil tries to make him feel better and reasons things out. - "I want to go home."  "-over my step over my head body!"
  • Discussion on what they have to do.  Talk about playing a game and getting "such thanks as fits a king's remembrance."  Trying to figure out their purpose.  Start a game of questions and have conversation at the same time.  Also trying to find themselves. - "What's your name when you're at home?"  "Consistency is all I ask!"
  • Discussion of Hamlet followed by attempt to mimic how the conversation with Hamlet would go through question and answer.  Rosencrantz doesn't get it and still confuses their names.  Also more puns about Gertrude's incestuous marriage to Claudius. - "Oh!  You mean - you pretend to be him, and I ask you questions!"
  • Hamlet actually enters, talking to Polonius.  Shift to scene with Hamlet and R and G.
Act Two

  • Skip scene with Hamlet, jump to when Players arrive.  More confusion between Rosencrantz and Guildenstern.
  • Ros and Guil discuss the success of their conversation, or rather, lack of success. - "I think we can say he made us look ridiculous."  "He murdered us."  "Half of what he said meant something else, and the other half didn't mean anything at all."
  • Discussion of directions in trying to figure out the direction of the wind to see if Hamlet is actually making sense.  Also trying to figure out their general direction.  Some sexual innuendos about licking toes? - "You won't find the answer written down for you in the bowl of a compass."
  • More talk about fate and identity. - "Wheels have been set in motion, and they have their own pace, to which we are...condemned."
  • Ros plays a guessing game with Guil, and then it turns out that the coin he is hiding actually disappears.  Hamlet, Polonius, and Players interrupt the scene.  Ros, Guil, and the Players talk, first in puns, then in serious conversation.  Player complains about being left behind and gives an explanation of what actors are like and about being familiar with Elsinore. Then discuss Hamlet with the player. - "We're actors - we're the opposite of people!"  "I can come and go as I please."  "And I know which way the wind is blowing."
  • Try to work out what's wrong with Hamlet, reference Ophelia and Ros and Guil are confused again; understand that Polonius in love with Ophelia.  Guil wants order.
  • Discussion on death. - "Eternity is a terrible thought.  I mean, where's it going to end?"
  • Ros tries to stay calm with jokes and gets impatient at the same time.  Keeps getting the opposite of what he wants; parade enters when he forbids people to enter.
  • Another scene with the King and Queen.
  • Ros and Guil discuss Hamlet again and Player reappears.  Ros and Guil get surrounded by Players and Ros freaks out.  Players start reenactment of dumbshow. - "We are tied down to a language which makes up in obscurity what it lacks in style."
  • Interruption by Ophelia, Hamlet, Claudius, and Polonius.  Then retelling of Hamlet occurs with Player narrating. Another conversation about death and dying. - "Traitors hoist by their own petard? - or victims of the gods? - we shall never know!"  "It doesn't bring death home to anyone.... One day you are going to die."  "Audiences know what to expect, and that is all that they are prepared to believe in."  "It's just a man failing to reappear...  An exit, unobtrusive and unannounced."
  • Ros and Guil wake up on and try to figure things out.  Claudius comes and sends them to find Hamlet.  Spend time debating whether or not to find Hamlet together or alone and what direction to go, end up going nowhere fast.  Try to use their belts to stop Hamlet but hopelessly impossible.  Try to shepherd Hamlet to Claudius but he walks away.  Claudius enters, asks where Hamlet is, and almost leaves before Hamlet is escorted on by luck.
  • Suddenly Ros and Guil are taking Hamlet to England.  Lots of foreshadowing in discussion.  Talk about seasons.  Talk about wanting to know where they are. - "They'll have us hanging about till we're dead."  "The spring can't last for ever."  "I like to know where I am.  Even if I don't know where I am, I like to know that.  If we go there's no knowing."
Act Three
  • Wake up in the dark, talk about how to know if one is alive.  Signs of being on a ship.  Guil misunderstands "land of the midnight sun."  Discussion on time and location.  Guil mentions being unable to disbelieve anything.
  • Discuss containedness of being on a boat.  Also freedom.  Guil trying to work out their situation.  Repeated lines between Ros and Guil.
  • Game between Ros and Guil where Guil keeps getting the coin.  Guil getting nervous because he thinks it a repeat of never ending situation.  Discussion about money and similarity between the two again.
  • Ros starts freaking out.  Guil comforts him.  Tells him the situation.and start looking for the letter.  Discussion on believing in England  and death.  They act out the conversation with the king and discover that Hamlet is to be decapitated.
  • Guil works through the morality of it.  Ros feels bad.  Hamlet hears about it.  Ros still trying to work out the situation.  In the dark of that night, Hamlet replaces the letter.
  • Ros still trying to figure everything else.  Guil hears the pipe, recognize people coming.  Ros sent to identify source, finds the Players.
  • Discuss the situation with why the Players are there.  King is angry so they stowed away.  Discuss betting on certainties.  Guil discusses their lack of restrictions.  Hamlet shows distaste for the audience.  Back to discussing Hamlet and Ros and Guil repeat each other again.  Show similarities between Hamlet and the Player.
  • Pirates interrupt.  Leap into barrels to hide.  Player mourns Hamlet after he disappears.  Determines that Hamlet is dead.  Guil is nervous about not having Hamlet, the Player is interested in the set of their ways and relaxes.  Ros tries to keep Guil talking and happy.  More acting between the two.  Realize the change in the letter.
  • Player gets all of the other people out, discuss death with Ros and Guil.  Guil gets angry and tries to kill the Player, who acts dead but comes back. - "No one gets up after death."  "If there are no explanations for us, then let there be none for him."
  • Players act out all of the deaths at the end of Hamlet.  Guil and Ros keep talking, and Players disappear.  Ros wishes he could stay alive, but then accepts it and disappears.  Guil looks for him, then seems to expect to move on. - "Couldn't we just stay put?  I mean no one is going to come on and drag us off...."  "We've done nothing wrong!  We didn't harm anyone.  Did we?"  "I don't care.  I've had enough."
  • Play ends with the final scene between Ambassador and Horatio in Hamlet.

Characters
Rosencrantz
  • terrible memory
  • often confused and childlike
  • innocent to mature - seems to go through puberty
  • cares about others and has good intentions - "We're his friends."
  • often confused with Guildenstern - literally doesn't know his own name
Guildenstern
  • similar to Rosencrantz
  • tries to apply knowledge but often wrong - "The law of probability, it has been oddly asserted, is something to do with the proposition that if six monkeys..."
  • more aware of the situation and comes up with ideas
  • impatient and uncomfortable with the situation; dislikes being lost
  • philosophical
Player King
  • Believes in the power of acting and doing what his audiences want
  • Accepting of the situation and is more aware of his surroundings
  • Beliefs on death counter that of Rosencrantz and Guildenstern
Other Characters
  • Hamlet: Does not show complex motivation; seems less heroic
  • Alfred: boy in the Player group; often targeted in sexual jokes for low humor
  • Claudius and Gertrude: Establish similarities between Ros and Guil; mainly just say lines
Style and Voice
Point of View
  • Play so written in third person
  • Pretty extensive glimpses into characterization at times
  • Variety of philosophical opinions
Tone
  • Humorous and immature at times - sex jokes
  • Mocks Shakespeare and focuses on the princely characters
  • Mocks theater - breaking the fourth wall and scorning the audience
Imagery
  • Very descriptive stage directions provide some image of characters' actions
  • Not much imagery in describing scenes or set up of the stage
  • Focus remains on characters' words and actions
Symbolism
  • Coins - Chance/luck vs. Fate
  • Player's Music - Arrival of unexpectedness, usually negative
  • Compass/Wind - general directionless and aimless situation of Rosencrantz and Guildenstern
Themes
  • Death is nothingness. - Characters die dramatically in acting, but death is just nothingness, the final disappearance of the characters.
  • Fate is inescapable. - Rosencrantz and Guildenstern try to "go against" the plot that Shakespeare set for them but are lost.  The Player accepts the situation and knows where he is and what is going on.  It is impossible to escape from fate.  One must simply accept it and move on.

Sunday, March 10, 2013

Response to Course Materials 7

No clever titles this time.  I can't think of anything.

So what have we done recently in class?  Lots of Rosencrantz and Guildenstern Are Dead.  It's actually a pretty great read.  A little hard to understand, at times, to be sure, but there's a lot to think about in the text and what it means for the audience and life as a whole.  The confusing bits are almost reminiscent of The American Dream, like I said before.  Actually, I think what really helped a lot was the movie.  It showed a cool new perspective on it that Tom Stoppard himself was responsible for, since he directed it.  And the articles helped too, though I still think the one about Shakespeare essentially being the god of authors and the play to be a bit out-there.  But I guess that's the point of literature; to put ideas out there, no matter how radical they seem at times.

What else have we done recently?  We've actually done some more work on writing.  I know I missed the discussion of our essays on Friday, but who knows, I may still be able to figure out some things to write about.  At any rate, I think the practice is definitely helpful, even if I don't particularly like writing essays in class (honestly, who does?).  Still, considering we're going to have to do it on the AP exam, it's a good idea to get some practice in now, so we have an idea of what to include and how to time ourselves.  I feel like the Close Prompts may actually be more difficult, because they seem to be looking for very specific things about the readings which I'm afraid I might miss sometimes.  I'm also worried about my ability of picking out the meaning behind the piece.  Hopefully having more feedback will help.

And most recently, we started working on reading Ceremony.  I actually really like it.  It's interesting to read from the perspective of a non-Western-white-culture (that doesn't actually make much sense, I know).  I feel like there aren't enough books written from the perspective of minority groups and I really like the insights that it gives on the life of Laguna Pueblos.  Also, it's certainly intriguing with the stream-of-consciousness narration and unsteady timeline.  I find myself getting confused at times, but it's also really fun to try and figure out.  I feel like I'll be going through a lot of sticky notes to annotate it; my copy of the book is too nice and I don't want to write on it!  Anyway, I can't wait to explore it more!